ArticleOriginal scientific text

Title

Opportunities for the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas un Serbia

Authors 1

Affiliations

  1. Department for Urban Studies, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

This article discusses current problems in rural Serbia and investigates development opportunities. The intention is to indicate strengths and weaknesses of the present situation and to highlight possible solutions for sustainable development. The results were presented in the form of potential methods for future development and are discussed through several issues: sustainable regional development and sustainable rural development as an alternative to excessive urbanization; cultivating the tradition of the village and development of rural tourism; cultural heritage in the service of sustainable development; building the ecological image of the village through promotion of the local economy and organic farming; and social capital and infrastructure development as factors of sustainable development. The conclusion is that in planning the development of rural areas, villages should be seen as a value and their potentials and regional characteristics should be promoted and used in order to contribute to sustainable development.

Keywords

rural development, sustainability, localization, tourism, heritage, agriculture, tradition

Bibliography

  1. 1. BARBIČ A., 1997, Sustainable Development of Rural Areas – A project Approach, in: East European Countryside no 3, p. 39-55.
  2. 2. BROWN D.L., KULCSAR, L., 2000, Rural Families and Rural Development in Central and Eastern Europe, in: East European Countryside no 6, p. 5-23.
  3. 3. BRUNDTLAND COMMISSION (WCED), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
  4. 4. CIZLER J., 2011, Reuse of derelict industrial sites: opportunities for regeneration of industrial heritage in Pancevo, Serbia, in: Arhitektura i urbanizam no 33, p. 75-80, http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-6055/2011/0354-60551133075C.pdf (1.02. 2013).
  5. 5. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, ESPD – European Spatial Development Perspective, Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1999.
  6. 6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Sustainable Agriculture Production: Implications for International Re-search, FAO, Rome 1989.
  7. 7. GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 1996, Prostorni plan Republike Srbije [Spatial plan of Republic of Serbia], in: The Official Gazzete of Republic of Serbia no 13/96.
  8. 8. GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 2008, Nacionalna Strategija Odrzivog Razvoja – Predlog [National Sustainable Development Strategy – Suggestion], in: The Official Gazzete of Republic of Serbia no 7/08.
  9. 9. HAWKES J., The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability – Culture's essential role in public planning, Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd, Cultural Development Network (Vic), Australia 2001.
  10. 10. IKERD J., 2008, Sustainable Capitalism: A Matter of Ethics and Morality, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju /Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3, no 1, p. 13-22.
  11. 11. IMHOF D., Community supported agriculture: Farming with a face on it, in: The Case Against the Global Economy and a Turn Toward the Local, eds. Mander, J., Goldsmith, E., Sierra Club Books, San Francisco 1996.
  12. 12. KRONENBERG J, IIDA N., 2011, Simple Living and Sustainable Consumption, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju /Problems of Sustain-able Development, vol. 6, no 2, p. 67-74.
  13. 13. LYNCH, K., Gоod City Form, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1981.
  14. 14. MANDER J., GOLDSMITH E. (eds.), The Case Against the Global Economy: and for a Turn Toward the Local, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco 1996.
  15. 15. MEYER P.B., BURAYIDI M., 1991, Is Value conflict Inherent in Rural Economic Development? An Exploratory Examination of Unrec-ognized Choices, in: Agriculture and Human Values, Gainesville, USA, no 3, p. 10-18.
  16. 16. MIHALJEVIĆ G., Prostor kao faktor regionalizacije Srbije [Space as a factor in regionalization of Serbia], in: Polazišta i principi regeneracije regiona Srbije [Starting points and principles of the regeneration areas of Serbia], eds. Ralević, M., Stupar, A., Faculty of Architecture, Belgrade 2006.
  17. 17. MILIĆ B. Ruralni razvoj – Praktikum za lokalne aktere [Rural development - Practicum for local actors], SKGO, Belgrade 2011.
  18. 18. NORBERG-HODGE H., Shifting Direction: From Global Dependence to Local Inter-dependence, in: The Case Against the Global Economy: and for a Turn Toward the Local, eds. Mander, J., Goldsmith, E., Sierra Club Books, San Francisco 1996.
  19. 19. OESTERDIEKHOFF G.W., 2003, The Development of Organic Agriculture. Sustainable Development or Industrial Modernisation?, in: East European Country-side no 9, p. 63-73.
  20. 20. PAWLOWSKI L., 2010, Is Development of Nowadays World Sustainable?, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju /Problems of Sustainable Development vol. 5 no 2, p. 9-12.
  21. 21. PAWLOWSKI L., 2012, Do the Liberal Capitalism and Globalization Enable the Implementation of Sustainable Development Strategy?, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 7, no 2, p. 7-13.
  22. 22. PETOVAR K., Urbana sociologija – naši gradovi između države i građana [Urban soci-ology - our cities between government and citizens], Faculty of Geography, Belgrade 2003.
  23. 23. PROSHANSKY H., FABIAN A.K. and KAMINOFF R., 1983, Place Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology no 3, p. 57-83.
  24. 24. TICCIH, 2003, The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage, http://www.mnactec. cat/ticcih/industrial_heritage.htm (1.02.2013).
  25. 25. TODOROVIĆ M., BJELJAC Ž., 2009, Rural tourism in Serbian as a concept of development in undeveloped regions, in: Acta Geographica Slovenica no 49-2, p. 453-473.
  26. 26. UNESCO, Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, Paris 2005, http://unesdoc.unesco. org/images/0014/001429/142919e.pdf (1.02. 2013).
  27. 27. UNITED CITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, Agenda 21 for Culture, UCLG, Barcelona, 2004, http://agenda21cultur e.net/ index.php?option=com_content&view= article&id=44&Itemid=58&lang=sr(1.02. 2013).
  28. 28. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, Human Development Report 2004 – Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world, New York 2004, http://hdr.undp.org/ en/media/hdr04_complete.pdf (1.02.2013).
  29. 29. UNWTO, WTCC, EARTH COUNCIL, Agenda 21 for the Travel and Tourism Industry, UN, New York. 1995.
  30. 30. UNWTO website: http://sdt.unwto.org/en/ content/about-us-5 (1.02.2013).
Pages:
85-91
Main language of publication
English
Published
2013
Exact and natural sciences